Legal Opinion

Big Crow v. City of Rushville

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 2003No. S-01-1055PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.

This appeal presents procedural issues arising under Nebraska’s Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act. The Nebraska Court of Appeals reversed a summary judgment entered by the district court for Sheridan County in favor of the City of Rushville (the City) and remanded the cause for further proceedings in the district court. Big Crow v. City of Rushville, 11 Neb. App. 498, 654 N.W.2d 383 (2002). We granted the City’s petition for further review and now affirm the judgment on appeal, although our reasoning differs in some respects from that of the Court of Appeals.

FACTS

The uncontroverted facts…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gourley Ex Rel. Gourley v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Millman v. County of ButlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Jasa Ex Rel. Jasa v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Chicago Lumber Co. v. School District No. 71Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Hamilton v. NestorNebraska Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Geddes v. York CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Weeder v. Central Community CollegeNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Burke Ex Rel. Burke v. McKayNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Misle v. HJA, INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Kubik v. KubikNebraska Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API