Rende v. Rende

CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, Judge.

Mary Elizabeth Rende (“wife”) appeals the judgment of the trial court terminating the maintenance obligation of Richard J. Rende (“husband”) to her. Wife claims the trial court’s judgment was erroneous because husband failed to prove a change of circumstance so substantial and continuing as to make the maintenance obligation unreasonable. Wife also claims the trial court erred in denying wife’s motion for attorneys’ fees. We reverse and remand.

The marriage of wife and husband was dissolved on May 14, 1987. Husband appealed the dissolution, and the cause was remanded…