Legal Opinion

Kumar v. United States

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided October 29, 2020No. 2:17-cv-03065Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 2:15-cr-00185-KJD-GWH 2:17-cv-3065-KJD 8 Respondent, ORDER 9 v. 10 PRAKASH KUMAR, 11 Movant. 12 Presently before the Court is Movant’s Motion to Enlarge Time to File § 2255 (#44) and 13 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 2255

(#45). The 14 Government filed a response in opposition (#52) to both motions. Finally, before the Court is 15 Defendant’s Emergency Motion for Order Reducing or Modifying Sentence Under

18 U.S.C. § 16

3582 (#47). The Government filed a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Willie Lee Miles v. K.W. Prunty, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Sergey Spitsyn v. Robert Moore, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API