Lane v. Pipeline Construction Co.

This review considers claimant William Lane’s petition for modification which was rejected by the Judge of Industrial Claims, who was affirmed by the Full Commission.

Much of the history of this litigation is related in the dissenting opinion in the original determination of compensation benefits, Lane v. Pipeline Construction Company, Fla., 222 So.2d 19, and need not be repeated here.

The question before us is whether the five per cent permanent partial disability functional rating of claimant in the origi--nal affirmed order of the Judge of Industrial Claims entered on December 15, 1967,…