Legal Opinion

Giacona v. Conti Commodity Services, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1982No. CA-0054PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTT, Judge.

This is a claim for 1) commissions allegedly earned by plaintiffs, Peter Giacona and Cheryl L. Morgan, while employed by defendant, 2) penalties and attorney fees pursuant to LSA-R.S. 23:631 and 632, and 3) the balances on deposit by plaintiffs in savings accounts held by defendant. Defendant responded with a dilatory exception of prematurity pursuant to C.C.P. Art. 926(1) on the ground that plaintiffs had agreed to submit such disputes to arbitration when they accepted employment by defendant. After the trial court overruled the exception, defendant successfully invoked the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Franks v. Louisiana Health Serv. & Indem. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Wright v. Round the Corner Restaurants of La., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Giacona v. Conti Commodity Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  4. Giacona v. Conti Commodity Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Savings Bank of Baltimore v. VENTURE 73Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Giacona v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API