Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Chapman

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1937No. 5464Published

1Opinion

On Application for Rehearing.

2Per curiam

Defendants complain of the judgment herein and, in support of their application for a rehearing, assign errors. Only two of these have merit and the subject-matter involved in each and discussed in our judgment may be clarified without the granting of a rehearing.

First. Our decree recognized plaintiff as the owner of an undivided half interest in the S% of NE];4 of NEJ4; section 18, township 17 north, range 6 west, and ordered canceled from the records the two tax deeds to defendant, conveying this and other lands. It was not our purpose to decree these two tax…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs v. Concordia Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  2. Stockbridge v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. Gamet's Estate v. LindnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  4. Neal v. PitreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  5. St. Bernard Syndicate v. GraceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API