Johnson v. Chapman
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion
On Application for Rehearing.
2Per curiam
Defendants complain of the judgment herein and, in support of their application for a rehearing, assign errors. Only two of these have merit and the subject-matter involved in each and discussed in our judgment may be clarified without the granting of a rehearing.
First. Our decree recognized plaintiff as the owner of an undivided half interest in the S% of NE];4 of NEJ4; section 18, township 17 north, range 6 west, and ordered canceled from the records the two tax deeds to defendant, conveying this and other lands. It was not our purpose to decree these two tax…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Board of Com'rs v. Concordia Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Stockbridge v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Gamet's Estate v. LindnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Neal v. PitreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- St. Bernard Syndicate v. GraceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.