Tipton v. Randall
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On motion to strike out decree pro oonfesso.
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, Chancellor.
The files in this case show that the defendants answered the complainants’ bill, and that by an order made on March 23d, 1917, the answer was struck out and defendants given ten days within which to file an amended answer. Before the expiration of that time defendants’ solicitor served a notice on complainants’ solicitors of a motion to strike out the bill of complaint on various grounds, and claims that rule 75 of this court suspends the running of the time to file an amended answer. It does, in terms, but the question is as to whether or not the rule applies at all in…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Baird v. Board, C., South OrangeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
- Smith v. SmithNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Friel v. Diana Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- New Brunswick Motor Truck Sales, Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935