Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Van Syckle

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 22, 1937PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

The practical question propounded by the applicant is whether, in view of chapter 185 of the laws of 1936 (Pamph. L., p. 443), being a supplement to the Motor Vehicle Transfer act of 1931 (Pamph. L., p. 312) taken in connection with chapter 186 of the same year (Pamph. L., p. 444) which is an amendment to the Conditional Sales act of 1919, it is necessary for the protection of the seller of a motor vehicle by contract of conditional sale, that such contract be filed with the county clerk under the Conditional Sales act of 1919 (Pamph. L., p.…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Langer v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Gordon v. FollowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. TRUSTEES OF RUTGERS COLLEGE IN NJ v. RichmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Grand Union Co. v. SillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  5. Cobble Close Farm v. Bd. of Adjustment, Middletown Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API