Legal Opinion

Moldauer v. Walzer

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteuer, J.

The motion is to strike out certain paragraphs of the complaint. As to two of them it does not clearly appear that they have no bearing on the subject matter and as to them the motion is denied. (Indelli v. Lesster, 130 App. Div. 548.) The remaining paragraphs, designated 12th and 13th, deal with the financial standing of the defendant. The action is for necessaries supplied to the wife of the defendant, Morris Walzer, the necessaries being legal services. The purpose of the allegations is to aid in the determination of the value of the services.

There has been some difference of expression in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Indelli v. LessterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Levine v. RaymondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  2. Zolotorofe v. PearsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API