Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jorge Byron Alegria v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 30, 1991No. 90-6049Published

1DissentFay, Circuit Judge

I join in that portion of the court’s opinion holding that the proper venue provision for this action is § 1402(a)(1). However, I must respectfully dissent from the court’s conclusion that Congress cannot constitutionally provide different procedures for judicial review of jeopardy assessments to non-resident aliens than it provides United States citizens and resident aliens. I would affirm the district court’s dismissal of this action.

First, I am not convinced that non-resident aliens have constitutionally protected due process and equal protection rights in this context. The United States…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. Verdugo-UrquidezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Jean v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Nishimura Ekiu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Commissioner v. ShapiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API