Jorge Byron Alegria v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1DissentFay, Circuit Judge
I join in that portion of the court’s opinion holding that the proper venue provision for this action is § 1402(a)(1). However, I must respectfully dissent from the court’s conclusion that Congress cannot constitutionally provide different procedures for judicial review of jeopardy assessments to non-resident aliens than it provides United States citizens and resident aliens. I would affirm the district court’s dismissal of this action.
First, I am not convinced that non-resident aliens have constitutionally protected due process and equal protection rights in this context. The United States…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Verdugo-UrquidezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Jean v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nishimura Ekiu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Commissioner v. ShapiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.