Legal Opinion

Erie R. v. Reigherd

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1909PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio.

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, Circuit Judge.

Action in tort. The petition averred that the defendant company was a common carrier of passengers; that the plaintiff, while a passenger upon one of its cars in a train standing in its station at Cleveland, Ohio, was assaulted and beaten by one of its employés, a certain special railway detective, and violently ejected from said car with great force, by which he sustained injuries, etc. A second cause of action was in these words;

“Plaintiff: for his second cause of action incorporates above first cause of action as fully as if same were herein rewritten, and further…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Crescent City Live Stock Co. v. Batchers' Union Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Mayer v. WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  4. Wheeler v. NesbittSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  5. Langford v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. RembertDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1922
  2. Spain v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Marvin Roberts v. City of FairbanksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Collins v. OwensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Ryan v. ConoverOhio Court of Appeals · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API