Legal Opinion

Rikkers v. Menard Inc

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided November 8, 2021No. 2:17-cv-01208Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN TIMOTHY RIKKERS, Plaintiff, Case No. 17-cv-1208-bhl v. MENARD INC, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________________ This case presents a math problem masquerading as a lawsuit. Experts have weighed in, numbers have been crunched, and Plaintiff Timothy Rikkers has reached a disturbing conclusion: Menards’ celebrated “11% Rebate Sales” actually result in an effective rebate rate of only…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Judith Keane, Intervenor-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Shanahan v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Ronald Sweatt v. Union Pacific Railroad CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API