Legal Opinion

Watts v. Malatesta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.

Plaintiff sues defendants John B. Malatesta and J. B. Malatesta, Inc., to recover moneys lost as wagers upon horse races and relies for success upon the provisions of section 994 of the Penal Law. To show the extent of his losses plaintiff produced at trial the original checks drawn by him to the order of defendant Malatesta, which, it is clear, were received and cashed by, or in the interest of, that defendant. Defendant Malatesta pleads a counterclaim for moneys lost by him as wagers upon horse races, and paid over to plaintiff. The trial court (a jury having been waived) found in favor of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. People v. . StedekerNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Irwin v. . CurieNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Meech v. . StonerNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  5. Bunn v. RikerNew York Supreme Court · 1809

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Majlinger v. Cassino Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Brilliant v. RaidyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API