Legal Opinion

Winkler v. Sherman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 24, 2016No. 101428/13 581 580PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered December 19, 2014, which granted defendant Sherman’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, and order, same court (Robert D. Kalish, J.), entered May 29, 2015, which, to the extent appealable, denied plaintiff’s motion to renew, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A statute is presumed constitutional and that presumption can only be overcome by proof persuasive beyond a reasonable doubt (Hotel Dorset Co. v Trust for Cultural Resources of City of N.Y., 46 NY2d 358, 370 [1978]; Local Govt. Assistance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hotel Dorset Co. v. Trust for Cultural ResourcesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Local Government Assistance Corp. v. Sales Tax Asset Receivable Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Drillings v. Beth Israel Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Pullman v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fabian A. Makhanda and Quinn Makhanda v. Marsha M. Wright and AG Letitia James; Fabian A. Makhanda and Quinn Makhanda v. Marsha M. Wright, New York County Family Court, New York State Unified Court System, and John/Jane Does 15District Court, S.D. New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API