Bickwid v. Deutsch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Suffolk County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Absent a showing that a child’s needs are not being met, the support provisions of a separation agreement should not be disturbed unless there is proof of an unanticipated and unreasonable change in circumstances (Matter of Brescia v Fitts, 56 NY2d 132, 138-141; Matter of Boden v Boden, 42 NY2d 210, 212-213). There was no proof demonstrating that the needs of the children are not being met, and no…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brescia v. FittsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Boden v. BodenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Yecies v. YeciesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Tripi v. FaielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Bruhn v. McCreadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bickwid v. DeutschNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Bickwid v. DeutschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996