Legal Opinion
Hineline v. Minneapolis Honeywell Regulator
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 15, 1935No. 10240PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The appellant, plaintiff in the court below, who will be so referred to in this opinion, in 1931 brought an action against Minneapolis Honeywell Regulator Company in the state district court for Flennepin county, Minn., to recover the value of services alleged to have been rendered that company at its request. The action was removed to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota because of diversity of citizenship. It was for trial at the September, 1931, term. Upon the call of the calendar, the plaintiff announced the case for trial. There*856after, on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. RedmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Barrett v. Virginian Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Davies v. Mills Novelty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Falvey v. CoatsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. McCrearyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fenton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Hastings Mfg. Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
- Nelson v. DevneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- United States v. 12,800 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1947