Legal Opinion

Isaac v. West

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided February 17, 2000No. 96-739Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

This matter is before the Court on an application for attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (EAJA).

In the merits litigation, the appellant, veteran Dixon H. Isaac, appealed through counsel an April 10, 1996, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision denying his claim of clear and unmistakable error (CUE) in a final January 1980 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) regional office decision and determining that new and material evidence had not been presented to reopen a disallowed claim of VA service connection for a manic-depressive…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stillwell v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
  2. Gonzalez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  3. Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Labor, Petitioner-Cross v. Phoenix Roofing, Inc., Respondent-Cross v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  4. Claassen v. HecklerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1986
  5. Norris v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API