Legal Opinion

City of Valdosta v. Ousley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 12, 1932No. 9143PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

The sole question is whether the City of Yaldosta may lawfully bid on and purchase property offered for sale under executions issued by it to collect assessments for street paving. The act of the General Assembly applicable expressly to the City of Yaldosta, approved August 6, 1921 (Ga. Laws 1921, p. 1106 et seq.), provides (sec. 9) that when, under the “Oklahoma plan” provided in that act, paving is authorized by and laid under the authority of the city, assessments to pay for the same are “liens against the lots and tracts of land so assessed.” Section 11 provides for payment *778of assessments…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hopkins v. Chatham Phœnix National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crutchfield v. McCallieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API