Texas Oil Co. v. Veith

This is a suit for the recovery of $1200, paid in error, which enured to the benefit of defendant.'

Defendant reconvene's, claiming $S00 as a commission. Both the original and re-conventional demands were allowed by the trial court and by answer to the appeal. Both parties complain of the judgment.

Plaintiff’s demand results from the payment • of taxes on property belonging to defendant. It appears that defendant acquired the property known as the “Irma Warehouse,” which stood in defendant’s name, and in attempting to pay the city taxes on that property paid all taxes owed by defendant on…