Legal Opinion

Baldwin Co. v. Ceco Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 7, 1983No. 83-135PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The issue in this case is a procedural one. The trial court granted the appellee, Ceco Corporation’s, motion to dismiss a third party complaint filed against it by the Baldwin Company. We affirm the trial court’s ruling for two reasons. First, the appellant has been unable to demonstrate that the trial court committed error on the admitted facts and pleadings in this case. Second, even if the Baldwin Company has a cause of action against Ceco, it has not been denied that by the trial court’s ruling.

The facts are somewhat complicated, as well as the legal issue. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Larson MacHine, Inc. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. C & L Rural Electric Cooperative Corp. v. KincaidSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  3. Oaklawn Jockey Club, Inc. v. Pickens-Bond Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Oaklawn Jockey Club, Inc. v. JamesonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Looper v. Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Carton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Reed v. Alcoholic Beverage Control DivisionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Northwestern National Life Insurance v. HeslipSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Elk Corporation of Arkansas v. Builders Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API