Legal Opinion

Hubert v. May

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 24, 1961No. 13235PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENOCH, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Cyril Hubert, doing business as Curley’s Log Cabin Co., brought this action to recover damages for breach of contract and fraud. The District Court directed a verdict, in favor of the defendants, at the close of the plaintiff’s case, and this appeal followed.

Plaintiff contends that he presented evidence, including inferences reasonably drawn therefrom, from which (considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff) fair-minded men might honestly draw different conclusions, and that there were questions of fact which should have gone to the jury.

Mr. Hubert makes…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. May v. Chas. O. Larson Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  3. Columbus Pipe & Equipment Co. v. SefanskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Howard v. ReaumeMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Vargo v. IhlenfeldtMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Local 189, United Papermakers & Paperworkers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Local 189 v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,726 Arthur J. Hohmann, and Harold S. Burman v. Packard Instrument Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  5. Closed Circuit Corp. of America v. Jerrold Electronics Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API