Legal Opinion

State Bank of Troy v. Bank of Capitol

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1863PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Exceptions heard in the first instance at the general term.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.*—Hogeboom, J.

This action is brought by' the plaintiff against the defendant, to recover damages for defendant’s negligence in the protest of a draft sent to it for collection by the plaintiff.

The defendant was the plaintiff’s collecting agent at Albany, where the draft was payable. It was drawn by Oramel Brewster on Arland Carroll, and payable to the order of W. C. Watson, and indorsed by him, by John Roth & Co., to David Dater, who was the owner thereof, and who indorsed and delivered it to the plaintiff for collection; and the plaintiff, through its cashier, thereupon indorsed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smedes v. President of Bank of UticaNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  2. Williams v. Dakin & BaconCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
  3. Mead v. EngsNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  4. McKinster v. Bank of UticaNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  5. President of the Bank of Utica v. SmedesNew York Supreme Court · 1824

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sbarboro v. Health DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Big Sandy National Bank v. ChiltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Sbarboro v. Health DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API