Legal Opinion

McDonough v. Mesmer

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided September 28, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00035Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION JAIME R. MCDONOUGH, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 2:19-CV-35 SRW ) ANGELA MESMER, ) ) Respondent(s). ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Petition of Jaime R. McDonough for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The State has filed a response. Petitioner did not file a reply and the time for doing so has passed. Both parties have consented to the exercise of plenary authority by a United States Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). For the reasons set forth below, the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Wood v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API