Legal Opinion

United States v. Washington

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 1, 1961No. 17006PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.

The United States brought this action against the State of Washington and others to quiet its title, subject to the rights of the heirs of Samson Johns, to accretions adjacent to ocean uplands owned by plaintiff. Judgment was entered quieting title in the United States, subject to the rights of the heirs of Samson Johns, to all accretions formed prior to November 11, 1889, when Washington became a state, and in the State to all accretions formed since that date. The dividing line between such accretions was held to be the line of ordinary high tide, defined as that line…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hughes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Hughes v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. United States v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  4. Hughes v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Hughes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API