Legal Opinion
Stewart v. Cox
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 23, 1965No. Nos. 7966, 7967PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The appellants, Stewart and Lark, are state prisoners serving sentences in the New Mexico State Penitentiary. Their appeals present identical questions and were consolidated for disposition in this court. They brought separate habeas corpus proceedings in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico alleging, in substance, that their convictions were void because neither had been represented by counsel when they were brought before a state magistrate for a preliminary hearing. Lark alleges that he requested an attorney to represent him at that time. This allegation was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Hickock v. CrouseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- State of Utah v. Melvin Leroy Sullivan and Verne Alfred BraaschCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- James D. Mooneyham v. State of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Roy Ramsey v. Tracy A. Hand, Warden, Kansas State Pentitentiary, Lansing, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thomas M. Fasano v. Frank HallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Losinno v. HendersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- John R. Linton v. Harold A. Cox, Warden, New Mexico State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Kenneth Elton Stewart v. Harold A. Cox, Warden of the New Mexico State Penitentiary, James Floyd Lark v. State of New Mexico, and Harold A. Cox, Warden, New Mexico State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Ronald George Carter v. State of New Mexico, Chesten Avey v. State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966