Cardona v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.
The issue presented is whether the trial court erred in not holding an evidentiary hearing before ordering specific procedures for DNA testing. The procedures include having the evidence in question cut and divided by the state’s expert for the state to retain before appellant’s private laboratory has an opportunity to perform DNA tests. Also at issue is whether the trial court erred in denying appellant’s request to test hairs found on a T-shirt and bedding in the victim’s residence.
We find the trial court erred in allowing the state to cut and withhold certain parts of the evidence in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Brim v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Delhall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Overton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Andrew Michael Gosciminski v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
- Blackert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Cardona v. InchDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022