Rebelwood Apartments RP, LP v. English

¶ 63. I agree that this case should be reversed and remanded. However, I write separately to discuss my disagreement with the majority’s holding that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing expert testimony from Dr. Glenda Glover. Therefore, I concur in part and in result.

¶ 64. The majority acknowledges Reb-elwood’s concession that Dr. Glenda Glover is qualified as an expert in economics, but goes on to say that “... her opinion, as presented in this case, was not based on accurate, truthful facts.”

¶ 65. The accuracy or truthfulness of facts is a matter to be sorted out by a jury.…