Legal Opinion

Rose Associates v. Becker

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided March 27, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bruce J. Gould, J.

In contravention of Uniform Rules for Trial Courts (22 NYCRR) § 208.29, the process server failed to bring to the traverse hearing all records in his possession relating to the service. The traverse is upheld and the proceeding is dismissed.

*901Effective January 1, 1991, 22 NYCRR part 208 was amended by adding this new section to read in part: "Whenever the court has scheduled * * * [a traverse hearing and the process server will testify,] the process server shall be required to bring to the hearing all records in the possession of the process server relating…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Commercial Bank of Memphis, N. A. v. NdiayeNew York Supreme Court · 2001
  2. AMB Fund III New York III & IV, LLC v. WWTL Logistics, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2012
  3. Hudson House LLC v. GabrielAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API