Legal Opinion

Minnesota Moline Plow Co. v. Dowagiac Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 30, 1903PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. In Equity. On petition of appellee for a writ of mandamus and motion to dismiss appeal, and on appellants’ motion for special mandate.

1Opinion of the CourtSanborn, Circuit Judge

(orally). In these cases the motion or petition for a writ of mandamus to the United States Circuit Court to direct it to punish the defendants for contempt for failing to obey the injunction will first be considered. Without stopping to review the course of proceedings which led to the order of the court below refusing to punish the defendants for contempt, the fact is that this court held that the question whether or not the defendants were guilty of contempt was a matter within the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court. Thereupon that court considered the question, and determined that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kimberlin v. Commission to Five Civilized TribesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  2. Enoch Morgan's Sons Co. v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  3. United States ex rel. Harless v. Judges of United States Court of Appeals of Indian TerritoryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  2. United States v. MalminCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
  3. Great Northern Railway Co. v. HydeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  4. Larsen v. Nordbye, Judge (Chicago & N. W. R. Co., Intervener)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  5. Hosey v. KennamerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API