Brown v. Gray
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Pottawattamie District Court. — Thomas Arthur, Judge. The controlling controversy is over the existence of a partnership. The verdict found there was no partnership, and plaintiff appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.
— I. Proposition 5 contains this statement:
“The court erred in admitting in evidence each item and particle of testimony objected to by the plaintiff over the objection of the plaintiff, and to which the plaintiff excepted. That the said admission of evidence was prejudicial error.” This is utterly too general for consideration, and many of our decisions so hold.
1-a
One proposition is:
i. appeal and ?nd°to:defin^feet assignments. ‘ ‘ The court erred in sustaining objections of the defendant to the testimony of plaintiff, Brown, called in rebuttal for further examination in chief, to further…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davis v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Wheeler v. SchilderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
3Cited by4 opinions
- Simpson v. Occidental Building & Loan Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
- State v. AkersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Lein v. John Morrell & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Schmoller & Mueller Piano Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927