Legal Opinion

Thomas Keller White and Hal W. Metz v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 18, 1969No. 25955PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellants, White and Metz, were indicted as codefendants and were jointly tried in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Both were convicted on a count charging that they conspired to receive and pass counterfeit federal reserve notes in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 472, 473 (1964), and each was convicted on two counts charging substantive violations of 18 U.S.C. § 472 (1964).

On this appeal, Metz raises two points of error. First, he contends that he was denied an adequate opportunity prior to trial, to inspect certain fingerprint and handwriting…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Howard A. Blachly and Robert L. McMillen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. The United States of America v. Benjamin Levinson, Franklin Mortgage Corporation, Edward P. Strang, Jr., Ross HowardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. William Herman JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  2. James v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Sam Hoover v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. A. C. Park v. H. T. (Tommy) HuffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API