Legal Opinion

Waugh v. Firemen's Fund Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

The plaintiff Waugh brought this action as attorney in fact of one Lapadula on a fire insurance policy issued to the latter by the defendant company. There are other defendants against whom relief is sought on other bases — but their presence in the action is of no moment on the present issue. The relevant defenses pleaded by the insurer are, among others, fraud in the inducement of the issuance of the policy, knowing increase in hazard in breach thereof, misrepresentation as to the value of the insured premises, and false swearing in relation to the loss, thus voiding the policy.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Quinn v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Semsky v. Jo-Mar Bake Shop Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Untermeyer v. United States Olympic Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lentini Bros. Moving & Storage Co. v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Mitchell v. County of DutchessNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Sheremeta v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API