Legal Opinion

Shure Incorporated v. Clearone, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 28, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01343Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE SHURE INCORPORATED, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 19-1343-RGA V. CLEARONE, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER At issue is whether Shure can present evidence of a reasonable royalty after the Magistrate Judge excluded part of Shure’s damages expert opinion. (See D.I. 615 at 6 n.2). ClearOne argues that Dr. Vander Veen’s reasonable royalty opinion has been excluded and Shure has not disclosed any alternate royalty theory through fact or expert discovery. /d. Shure responds, “a reasonable royalty is required by law as the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Michael Meyers, Individually and as Representative of a Class v. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Association and Marion A. SteinbronnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. Peterson v. WillieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Penn National Insurance v. HNI Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. N5 Technologies LLC v. Capital One N.A.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API