Legal Opinion

Struna v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 27, 1950No. 16291PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hays

Defendants were charged in separate counts of an information with rape and assault to commit rape of prosecutrix, a deaf mute, twenty-one years of age. Each was convicted on the second count, sentenced to the penitentiary, and they here seek reversal of the judgment, relying upon numerous errors alleged to have been committed by the trial court. Most of the errors assigned for reversal, relate to admitting, excluding or in refusing to strike, certain evidence, which are matters resting within thé sound discretion of the trial court. We have examined the record in the light of each error…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Battalino v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  2. Olguin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  3. Seeley v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  4. Morgan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. McKennaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. Walker v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  3. People v. GallegosSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  4. People v. SharpeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  5. State v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API