Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 22, 2002No. A02A1432PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Senior Appellate Judge.

The trial court granted Rhett Darnell Anderson’s motion to suppress evidence of a State-administered blood alcohol test on the grounds that the State did not reasonably accommodate Anderson’s request for an independent test. The State appeals.

*128The trial court found the following facts:

[The] Defendant submitted to the State’s requested breath test. The Defendant then requested an independent blood test. The police officer determined that the Defendant did not have sufficient funds on his person to afford an independent blood test. No effort was made to determine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Joel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Butts v. City of Peachtree CityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Thornhill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Avant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Cadden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ritter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API