Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Director

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 1, 1973No. App. No. 27PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

Contrary to views expressed at times by those who may not understand them, laws and rules governing procedures in our system of administration of justice are far from being mere “technicalities.” Such laws and rules constitute the flesh which fills out the skeleton made up of our substantive rights and responsibilities. Without procedures for invoking or enforcing those substantive rights and responsibilities, they would be bare indeed. A right without the means of enforcing it is an empty right.

*51In a society governed by laws and not by men, the laws and rules of procedure must be clearly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Austin v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  2. Mullen v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Green v. DirectorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. Creswell v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bremer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API