Legal Opinion

Walden v. . Ray

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Civil action for the recovery of land, tried before Coble, J., and a jury at May Term, 1897, of Cumberland Superior Court. The usual issues in ejectment were submitted on which there was a verdict for the defendant and from the-judgment thereon the plaintiffs appealed. ' ■

1Opinion of the Court

Douglas, J.:

This is an action in the nature of ejectment for the recovery of land. The plaintiffs claim through the feme plaintiff, whose ancestor went upon the land fifty years ago. The land appears to have been in the uninterrupted adverse possession of the plaintiffs and those through whom they claim for more than twenty years, and, with a slight interruption, for more than thirty years. No paper title was shown by the plaintiffs. The defendant claims-under a tax title. The issues submitted were as follows: “1. Is the plaintiff the owner of the land described in the complaint? 2. Is the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bryan v. . SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Hamilton v. . IcardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. Mallett v. . SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. Davis v. . McArthurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  5. Cowles v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. FrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Lewis v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Brinkley v. Smith.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  4. Johnson v. . FrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API