Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Winders v. Illinois Central Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 1929No. 26,867PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Concurrence

I agree that the courts of Minnesota cannot refuse to entertain this case for absence of jurisdiction and therefore that there should be no dismissal. But the case presents another problem, somewhat ignored by the opinion, in respect to which I cannot remain silent.

That the case was solicited and procured at Paducah, Kentucky, by a lay employe of plaintiff's attorneys regularly engaged for that purpose, is demonstrated if the record be read in the light of common knowledge. The courts of Minnesota are trying every year a mysteriously large number of foreign personal injury cases. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. State ex rel. Reynolds v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Jackson v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Winders v. Illinois Central Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API