Legal Opinion

Clements v. Williams

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1941No. Application No. 25427PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

per curiam :

The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals (146 S. W. (2d) 215) makes the following statement: >

“Appellant testified that there was added to the $1,236.81 principal enough interest to make the face value of the note $1,457.50, which was to be amortized by monthly payments of $27.50 each, which monthly payments included both principal and interest; and the note and contract provided that the holder could mature the entire debt upon failure to- pay any monthly installment when due.”

It will be noted that the opinion says “and the no;fce and contract provided that the holder could…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Walker v. Temple Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Clements v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mack v. NewtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. SchuenemannTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Coastal Cement Sand Inc. v. First Interstate Credit Alliance, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  4. Brookshire v. Longhorn Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Sinclair v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API