Legal Opinion

PANASONIC INDUSTRIAL COMPANY v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1990No. A90A0962PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

Plaintiff/appellant Panasonic Industrial Company brought suit against defendant/appellee Capital Business Systems, Inc., and defendant/appellee Jack D. Hall, as guarantor, alleging that defendants were indebted to it for typewriters and other merchandise supplied on an open account to Capital Business pursuant to the parties’ dealership agreement. The trial court directed a verdict for defendant Hall, and Panasonic and Capital Business agreed to settle the remaining issues pursuant to a consent agreement. Held:

1. In its first enumeration of error Panasonic contends that the trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fidelity National Bank v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. Rogers v. C. & S. NATIONAL BANKCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Rice v. GEORGIA RAILROAD BANK & TRUST COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Thurmond v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Bank of Loganville v. LisleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fielbon Development Co. v. Colony Bank of Houston CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Lothridge v. First Nat. Bank of GainesvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. Caves v. Columbus Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Ramirez v. GoldenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Bank South, N. A. v. GrizzleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API