Legal Opinion

United Film Ad Service v. Roach

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

— This is a suit in equity in which the plaintiff, a judgment creditor of the Ruth Molly-ets Company, seeks to have a certain fund in the hands of defendant Roach, constable, through his deputy, Rice, applied to the payment of plaintiff’s judgment after a judgment of one Hatfield is paid out of the fund. Plaintiff prayed for an order from the court upon the constable requiring him to levy under plaintiff’s judgment upon the balance, of the proceeds in the deputy’s hands realized from the sale of certain personal prop,ertj7 of the judgment debtor under an execution upon the Hatfield judgment;…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Strode v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Hoyt v. ClemansSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. Smith v. Crawford County State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  5. First National Bank v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  2. Cunningham v. G. F. C. Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  3. First Security Bank v. Zaring Farm & Livestock Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
  4. General Electric Capital Corp. v. Union Planters Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2003
  5. National Ass'n of Credit Men, Montana-Wyoming Unit v. MossWyoming Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API