Legal Opinion

United States v. Baker

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 27, 1970No. 23,098PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

The appellant in this case was defended by appointed counsel qualified in accordance with Article 27(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 827. In response to questions by the military judge, Baker acknowledged that he was aware of his right to be represented by a civilian lawyer or a military lawyer of his own selection. He was satisfied with appointed counsel, however. This inquiry meets the demands of Article 38(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 838. United States v Turner, 20 USCMA 167, 43 CMR 7 (1970).

Introduction of evidence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  2. United States v. YoungUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  3. United States v. DuronUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  4. United States v. GauthierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  5. United States v. LindsayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. JerasiU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API