United States v. Baker
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Darden, Judge:
The appellant in this case was defended by appointed counsel qualified in accordance with Article 27(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 827. In response to questions by the military judge, Baker acknowledged that he was aware of his right to be represented by a civilian lawyer or a military lawyer of his own selection. He was satisfied with appointed counsel, however. This inquiry meets the demands of Article 38(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 838. United States v Turner, 20 USCMA 167, 43 CMR 7 (1970).
Introduction of evidence…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. YoungUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. DuronUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. GauthierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. LindsayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. JerasiU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985