Legal Opinion
State v. Beverly
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided November 20, 2013No. 2013-0827PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Clark App. No. 2011 CA 64, 2013-Ohio-1365.
On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted and the discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I only.
Lanzinger, J., concurs and would hold the cause for the decision in case Nos. 2013-1129 and 2013-1319, State v. Griffin, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 24001, 2013-Ohio-2230. O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, J., concur but would grant the motion as to both propositions of *1415law. Pfeifer, Kennedy, and French, JJ., dissent.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. BeverlyOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. GriffinOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Bolton v. SchwigtorDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021