Save the Valley, Inc. v. INDIANA-KENTUCKY ELECTRIC CORPORATION
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
BARNES, Judge.
We grant the Appellees' petitions for rehearing; however, we affirm our opinion in all regards. We issue this opinion on rehearing to address an argument raised by IKEC for the first time in its petition for rehearing and to clarify the issue of the trial court's subject matter jurisdiction.
IKEC argues in its petition for rehearing, "OEA did not have before it a petition meeting the requirements of the Statute within the 15-day deadline and thus did not acquire jurisdiction over the case." IKEC's Petition for Rehearing p. 12. It does not appear, however, that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Holmes v. ACandS, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burcham v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Div. I of Marion CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Trans-Care, Inc. v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CTY. OF VERMILLIONIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Board of Commissioners v. Northeastern Indiana Building Trades CouncilIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Hall v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Indiana-Kentucky Electric Corp. v. Save the Valley, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.