Legal Opinion

Austin Hill Country Realty, Inc. v. Palisades Plaza, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided September 27, 1995No. 03-94-00485-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POWERS, Justice.

Barbara A. Hill, Annette Y. Smith, David J. Jones, and Austin Hill Country Realty, Inc., conducting business under the name Re/Max Austin Hill Country Realty, Inc. (“Re/Max”), appeal from a district-court judgment recovered by Palisades Plaza, Inc., (“Palisades”) after a jury trial. We will affirm the trial-court judgment.

THE CONTROVERSY

Appellants entered into a five-year lease contract with Palisades for office space. The contract, dated September 15,1992, required monthly rental payments of $3,128 beginning around November 15, 1992. An addendum to the contract provided that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Resolution Trust Corp. v. CramerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Austin Hill Country Realty, Inc. v. Palisades Plaza, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Cash America International, Inc. v. Hampton Place, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. GKG.NET, Inc. D/B/A Global Knowledge Group v. Mitchell Rudder Properties, LP, Successor in Interest of Karbrooke, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  4. GKG.Net, Inc. v. Mitchell Rudder Properties, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API