Legal Opinion

Berg v. Stromme

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 4, 1970No. 26-40331-3Published

1Opinion of the Court

1 Wn. App. 916 (1970)

465 P.2d 181

RICHARD BERG, Appellant,

v.

ARTHUR STROMME et al., Respondents.

No. 26-40331-3.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

February 4, 1970.

Horton, Wilkins & Horton and Hugh B. Horton, for appellant.

Peterson, Taylor & Day and Stanley D. Taylor, for respondents.

REVIEW GRANTED BY SUPREME COURT.

GREEN, J.

Plaintiff, Dr. Richard Berg, brought this action against defendants, d/b/a Stromme Motors, for damages alleging the sale of and refusal to replace or satisfactorily repair a defective new car. At the close of plaintiff's evidence, the trial court dismissed the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Dunham v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API