Legal Opinion

Finley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1992No. WD 46150PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Donald Finley appeals from the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief. Finley contends that his sentence exceeded the maximum statutory penalty for the crime.

The judgment is affirmed.

Finley pleaded guilty to the possession of lysergic acid diethylamide, a Schedule I controlled substance, § 195.020, RSMo 1986. On September 1, 1987, the trial court sentenced him to a twenty-year term of imprisonment pursuant to § 195.200.1(1), RSMo 1986. The trial court suspended the execution of the sentence and placed Finley on a five-year period of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BachmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Barnes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. State v. TippettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Mannon v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. ChambersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  2. Morgan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Hawkins v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Taylor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Engelmann v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API