Legal Opinion

Hounshell v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 2, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Breathitt Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Miller

Affirming.

The appellant, Harvey Hounshell, owned a tract of land in Breathitt County. On June 30, 1898, he sold to C. Kelman all the white oak and chestnut oak timber on the land for one hundred dollars. From this sale, however, Hounshell excepted 74 branded trees. By the terms of the contract Kelman had five years to remove the timber he had bought. By a subsequent contract, dated December 20, 1898, Hounshell sold to Smith, for a cash consideration of $104.55, all the white oak and poplar trees having certain diameters, consisting of 83 white oak trees and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Ladd v. OsborneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  3. Musselman v. MarquisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1866
  4. McCloskey v. DohertyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gabbard v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Ream v. FugateCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  3. Wunderlich v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Aboud v. BailenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. Collins v. PigmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API