Legal Opinion

Redding v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 22, 1989No. A89A0559PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Judge.

We granted appellant’s petition for interlocutory review of the denial of his motion to suppress evidence that he committed burglary, rape, and aggravated sodomy. Appellant contends that the evidence, samples of his hair and blood, which link him to the crime scene and victim, was obtained as a result of a search warrant issued without probable cause because it was based on misrepresentations to the issuing magistrate, and that it was illegally executed. OCGA § 17-5-30.

It is undisputed that in preparing the affidavit in support of the search warrant, the affiant, Detective…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Kelly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Nutter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Daniels v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. Bickley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Gunsby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Redding v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Porter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API