Legal Opinion
Chung Que Fong v. Nagle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 15, 1926No. 4937PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES, District Judge.
The District Court, holding that the petition for writ of habeas corpus presented on behalf of Chung Que Fong, a native of China, considered in connection with the record of deportation proceedings, did not disclose facts sufficient to warrant the issuance of the writ, dismissed the petition. The alien appealed.
At the time of the filing of the petition for the writ, the Commissioner of Immigration at San Francisco held a warrant issued by the Secretary of Labor requiring that the alien he returned -to his native country. This warrant of deportation was issued by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hampton v. Wong GingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- United States ex rel. Grimaldi v. EbeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
- Weedin v. Moy FatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Kells v. McKenzieU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1881
3Cited by9 opinions
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Dang Nam v. BryanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Todaro v. MunsterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Hachiji Shibata v. TillinghastDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.